A good friend of mine emailed me information on a hand he was in and asked how I would have played it.
He is a very solid player and could easily promote himself to the Rounder category of card player. (He does not need the money and plays mostly for fun)
Here is what he wrote:
I have my $300 buy-in in front of me. The table is wild with bluffs and big bets.
The guy to my right bets $10 preflop and I CORRECTLY put him on A-K.
I have 7-4 suited and there are 5 players to the flop.
The flop is K-7-4 rainbow.
The A-K bets $20 into a $50 pot.
I’m next to act and raise to $80 to get rid of everybody else.
Everyone folds except the original bettor. He re-raises me $100.
I do not put him on K-K for top set. He would have bet harder preflop with that hand. I go back to my original read of A-K.
I push all in.
He calls and shows A-K and sighs when he sees my two pair.
The turn is a deuce.
He hits an Ace on the river.
I read everything right, got all my money in being a 4-to-1 favorite and lost.
How would you have played it?
In short, you got unlucky.
That said, here are my thoughts:
The wild nature of the table was not a factor here. You were dealing with a below average player, at best, that was obsessed with A-K.
Why do I say that? With your strong table image and you playing back at me on the flop, I would have given you credit for at least two pair or a set.
You are not the K-7 or K-4 kind of guy. So, I would have played it safe and put you on a set of 4s or set of 7s. My A-K would have been in the muck.
I would have played it the same. You got unlucky.
But, I probably would not have played 7-4 suited in early position (or any position) with a wild table like that.
If I was feeling frisky AND was playing with their money and not my original buy-in, I may have played the hand.
The problem with having suited connectors with one or two in the gut is they are not profitable hands over the long run. With two in the gut, you can hit only one nut straight.
Compare that to a J-10 where you can hit five straights and four of them are the nuts.
When I am at a table with bad players, the range of hands I normally play gets reduced by 67%.
If the table of bad players is a wild one, I reduce it again by 67%.
This translates into playing 8-8 or better and J-10 suited or better from late position.
I cannot recall the last time my bottom two pair held up when someone flopped top pair. Bottom two is a dangerous hand. If the board pairs or they hit their other hole card, it all over baby.
Until recently, I took refuge with the fact that I put the money in good and could only be beat with pure luck.
How many times does one have to get unlucky with less than premium hands against bad players?
That experience forced me to tighten up my game.
And even then, luck is a factor.
Just like when I was at a wild table of bad players and got it in good on the flop with A-A and got beat by a player under the gun that called $100 preflop in a $1-$2 game with J-8 offsuit to protect their $10 straddle.






